Dating photography in general is that much more technical and if guys aren't getting results from pro photoshoots either they're not giving proper guidance to the photographers or the photographer is just underqualified. If guys actually vet photographers and see that they've achieved meaningful results for others, the sky is the limit. AI in general only really caps off at great quality while you actually need humans themselves to achieve outstanding profiles which is what's necessary to dominate on apps especially if you're not at least a 9/10 or so. Some world governments are already realizing this when they replace young people with AI.

It's pretty much a matter of do you want something that guarantees results but with risk of losing everything and it capping off at 8/10 quality or actually put in the effort yourself and experience the plentiful fruits of your labour in the most satisfying manner? To me, the answer is obvious for anyone who genuinely wants results in the game.

Oops, should be good now. Pretty much I used AI smoothening features on my face.

Oh yeah here's all the unedited ones from the shoot. Initially I just posted the ones I'd think would do well above: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1Qvt1gEcPgwlYB3h0vIN0sgTWL-z1USks

I'm curious of some edits you'd recommend.

At the moment, from highest to lowest priority my muscle groups go: shoulders, chest, back, arms, legs, abs. I've always focused heavily on shoulders because they're the main factor in achieving the v-taper which seems to be the most noticeable attribute to lean, muscluar bodies. My bench PR is 225lbs though I'm not certain what that would look like. I'm trying to get that to 315lbs by the end of summer though.

I'm not so confident 180lbs has the room to generate enough muscle to achieve a 1.6 shoulder to waist ratio (research shows it's part of the optimal build) seeing how I'm 193lbs and still don't feel that big, but in the same token I don't think I have to do aggressive cutting either as I've always had a fast metabolism. I think I'll first see what getting to 197lbs and then cutting down to 190lbs does (loses about 3.6% bf).

She came one time to my recollection. From what I've seen on men lasting 4 times shorter than women on average I doubt it's because my sexual performance wasn't good. I could try a another follow up soon.

Does it have to be that long? I find myself lacking the energy if I go a whole day without eating. What if I were to skip breakfast and just eat 500 calories throughout the day?

If you're 6'0, would you say 195lbs 12% body fat or 175lbs 8% body fat works better? I remember in a video where Alex said that the former is slightly more attractive.

She only said if I wanted to pick her up so I think it's still possible to close at hers. How else would you frame it as such?

I don't prefer to initiate sexualization over text if we never met in-person before since I feel like it might slut-shame them and turn them away.