On March 31, Tinder announced they were making Passport free for all users around the world for the month of April. Seemingly every woman saw it and said “Perfect, now I can get validation from men in popular cities that I’m not even in... and not even have to meet them in real life!” and within hours, popular destinations like Los Angeles, NYC, Miami, London, Amsterdam, Barcelona, and Paris were flooded, making finding locals nearly impossible. Luckily, the majority of people using Passport simply type in a city name instead of choosing a point within that city manually. When this is done, Tinder locates those users in the exact center of the city. Given this fact, the workaround was fairly obvious (to me, at least), but I’ll document it here for posterity: Go to https://obeattie.github.io/gmaps-radius/ and navigate to your city. Select a swipe distance that you’re comfortable with, and click a point on the outskirts of your city such that your radius excludes the city center Go to Tinder, open the now-free Passport, manually choose the center of this radius, and set your distance to match Gmaps Radius. alt text There you go! Now you can swipe in a very specific radius while avoiding most of the Passport timewasters, who are all clustered in the center of your city. Once you exhaust all the profiles in this radius, simply repeat the process until you’ve worked your way around the city, avoiding the center (by that time, April should be over, anyway).
Posts by Pancake Mouse
Joined 7y ago"http://pancakemouse.wordpress.com"
Sort By
Free versions, generally all swipes/likes used up to the limit: Me: white, average face, good physique, probably around the 45 percentile for men in SF looks-wise Tinder: 6 matches, average quality 6.25 Hinge: 8 matches, average quality 6.75 Facebook Dating: 18 matches, average quality 6.56 Haven't completed the week with Bumble yet but it's going to be abysmal I can tell. Facebook Dating is lowkey a goldmine here. Mix of low-class women, foreigners/au pairs, and some tech workers and women looking for something serious. But it's a great way to spit game at foreign chicks with less competition.
Over the past year+, many users on the Hinge subreddit as well as a few in the Game commnuity have reported an unfortunate bug in Hinge where they only see the lowest-rated users in their Discover section. I'm doing a survey to see if we can crowdsource some information on why this might be happening. If this has happened to you, please leave a comment on the following thread in the Hinge subreddit: Investigative survey for users experiencing Hinge's bug that only displays the least-attractive users in Discover
Say someone wanted to match with 18 year olds and wants to know what fake age to set, what is the max upper range that Tinder sets their age preference to? For example, for a 28 year old it's 18-38. Maybe one of our resident 18 year olds can chime in... though not sure if it's different for girls vs. guys.
Hi. I used to post here a lot and run a blog about online game (http://pancakemouse.wordpress.com). I stopped using Tinder in Fall 2019, and continued to not use it during the pandemic. Recently a friend had asked me to sign up for Tinder and see what the scene is like so we could compare notes. Here is my analysis from one week of swiping. I am located in the San Francisco Bay Area, using the standard version of Tinder with no upgrades. I nearly maxed out my 200 swipes each 24 hours, so I swiped probably 1300+ girls. I ended up with 5 matches and zero numbers. Tinder Gold informs me that 33 additional girls have swiped right on me. Quality of girls in the queue is low, much lower than it was in previous years. I estimate I swiped right on only 35% of girls. Typically I'm at 50-60%. Anecdotally, population is extremely low compared to normal times. In only ~1300 right swipes, I exhausted every girl within a 7 mile radius. Multiplied by my swipe right percentage, that's an estimated 3700 girls. In previous years where I've scraped profiles, there have been 10-15K girls within a 10 mile radius of my house. So we can conclude that less than half of female profiles are active during the pandemic than usual, and probably about a third. Compared to previous years, my amount of matches is very low. Even early last year with the basic version of Tinder, I was getting 15-17 matches per week on the same number of swipes. Cofounders: I used kind of a douchey profile compared to the one I normally used. Shirtless photo, ripped gym selfie, partying in Vegas. It's possible it got less likes than my normal profile. I also did not verify my account. Conclusion: Free Tinder likely not worth it at this point. Will restart sometime in January with my normal profile and a verified account and try for another week. At that point, I'll evaluate whether it's worth it to spend money on Plus/Gold/Platinum.
Reset early August, immediately got 16 matches in the first 12 hours of having an account. I kept the same account, swiped some every day. Ended up with less than 30 matches total. Think about that — I got more than half my matches in the first 1.5% of the total time I had my account open. If you are serious about Tinder, you need to be resetting every week to take advantage of this.
This appears to be happening as of the newest Android app update on May 28, 2019 (Version 10.16.0 according to my Settings). Uploading via PC works fine, but it's not a viable solution as Tinder massively downsamples the images to something like 400px width (lol @ modern web "technology") Anyone else?
