Volume of matches vs. volume of "qualified" matches

4 Comments
4 Cmts
J

10 Posts (+6)

16 Cmts (+9)

J

10 Posts (+6), 16 Cmts (+9)

I've been experimenting with a dominant/high value and a pretty boy profile and the dominant one gets less matches because I look kinda old in the first picture, bad eye area, but it's a badass photo, then the rest of the pics are conveying a certain lifestyle.

Although I prefer using this profile because I get more quick lays with it. I have less girls unmatching me once I start talking about kinky sex & cuddles etc.

Anyway I might be wrong, but I've decided to stop worrying about matches and just focus on results. My best week was 4 new girls but I thought the profile I used was trash. Maybe that profile just conveyed the dominant fuck boy vibe better? Idk. Maybe I'm overthinking this but when I overthink it shows that I'm passionate about something, and during this quarantine I've been pretty apathetic and depressed, so it's been fun to have a project again, no matter how pointless it is.

Sorry for ranting. TL:DR do you think a better metric for judging the strength of a profile is past results (lays) or number of matches? Thanks.

0
avilench . Avatar

393 Posts (+1.3K), 15K Cmts (+5.3K)

The better metric is definitely lays. You can get a million matched a day but if none of them are leading to anything then what’s the point. I’ve also noticed something similar the more sexually I screen in the profile the more down my matches are to meet even if there is less of them

2
J

10 Posts (+6), 16 Cmts (+9)

πŸ‘

0
D

2 Posts (+0), 19 Cmts (+5)

Julien Blanc! I thought you would just cold approach chicks, problem solved πŸ˜›

0
J

10 Posts (+6), 16 Cmts (+9)

Yep, if the lay isn't cold approach it doesn't count πŸ˜›

0
Playing With Fire Logo