I get matched with hot girls but most of them only respond to 1-2 messages before going silent (+80% silence), vs with other ones like bumble, I get consistent follow through to the date most of the time (+60% convert to a date). It's like polar opposite even though my texting game is the same and so are my pics. Anyone else have this same issue? Super confused

+4
11 Comments
11 Cmts
J

13 Posts (+13)

40 Cmts (+11)

J

13 Posts (+13), 40 Cmts (+11)

J

13 Posts (+13), 40 Cmts (+11)

Thanks Alex. Out of curiosity, what's a 'normally good' conversion rate for online?

0
avilench . Avatar

393 Posts (+1.3K), 15K Cmts (+5.3K)

Honestly, I probably meet with less than 10% of my matches. And that's considered quite good

2
J

13 Posts (+13), 40 Cmts (+11)

Interesting, thanks. I use a mix of your texting style and my own from before I learned 'official' text game. Before Christmas, I was going on dates almost every day of the week, sometimes up to 3 a day. Got super burnt out but coming back now.

Guess I should be more satisfied with my results lol.

0
Pancake Mouse Avatar

15 Posts (+31), 492 Cmts (+149)

About 25 matches per date for me has been pretty consistent ratio throughout the years that I've used Tinder

60% is pretty unbelievable and probably speaks to an outlier with what you're doing on Bumble rather than a problem with Hinge. Though Bumble/Hinge are definitely higher conversion rate than Tinder; less timewasters

-1
J

13 Posts (+13), 40 Cmts (+11)

Cool thanks. @avilench, what about from your perspective? What's a 'normally good' conversion rate for online

0
Playing With Fire Logo