Let's take a typical woman's account on tinder/hinge/bumble etc. She has 100s of likes/potential matches. Probably doesn't get 100s of matches per day (assuming most women don't have premium versions of the apps), but still matches with nearly every guy she swipes right on. My questions are: How many of these matches lead to conversations? How many of these matches lead to numbers/off-app interactions? How many of these interactions lead to dates? How many of those dates lead to sex? Trying to work out how significant each 'hurdle' is to a woman in contrast to a man. For example, are girls giving their # to 100s of guys each day, with very little intention of actually dating, or is # exchange a solid indicator that she's at least got some interest in dating/having sex?
1 Post (+0), 9 Cmts (+5)
11 Posts (-4), 251 Cmts (+142)
Does the amount of matches and such change anything on your end? Not really.
You need a solid profile and to have solid text game. Whether or not a girl gets 50 or 500 matches a day is not something you can control, so why worry?
I think common sense says a woman is not giving out her # dozens of times per week, on average.
1 Post (+0), 9 Cmts (+5)
IMO it changes a heap. If a girl is giving out her # to any guy she exchanges more than 2 messages on the app with, then her 'intent' behind each guy is very low.
When that's the case, you still need to build a lot of interest/stand out.
If you're the only guy she gives a number to per week, then she's already very invested in making things work with you, and it's simply your job not to fuck it up.
Solid text game is relative to how much 'intent' a woman has shown to you. If she's outright said she will have sex with you on this date, at this place, then you don't need text game. Your text game should be tailored to where you are in the interaction, IMO, and hence the importance of knowing where you are on this scale.
11 Posts (-4), 251 Cmts (+142)
How would you find out how many times a woman is giving out her number? It would vary from person to person.
Again, worry about putting your best foot forward and let the chips fall where they may.