I haven't seen this distinction made before so posting it here. I did some testing and realized that Tinder has two types of shadowbans. The hard shadowban is where you just don't get any matches at all. If you turn on boost, it won't show you the micro avatars of people who saw your boost, because your profile is invisible. The soft shadowban is a bit different. If you delete your subpar profile and make a new improved one too many times, unknown to you, your swipe history will be restored, so most ladies won't see you if you exhausted your area previously. Most people would imagine with a soft shadowban their matches are being reduced when in fact it's the pool of ladies.

+2
20 Comments
20 Cmts
A

4 Posts (+2)

17 Cmts (+7)

A

4 Posts (+2), 17 Cmts (+7)

Pancake Mouse Avatar

15 Posts (+31), 492 Cmts (+149)

The " If you delete your subpar profile and make a new improved one too many times, unknown to you, your swipe history will be restored, so most ladies won't see you if you exhausted your area previously." theory is interesting, but I don't think it's really feasible to prove this.

I do agree about the "two types of shadowbans" thing though. I see it more as true shadowban vs. degraded Elo.

0
A

4 Posts (+2), 17 Cmts (+7)

You can prove it by mass swiping or super boosting 3 times then remake your profile.

You will run out if matches a lot faster on your remade Tinder profile. Clear as day.

I made a macro to mass swipe on the web version. It was better than super boost.

I was foolish and did both a few months ago, not knowing the consequences.

ELO doesn’t exist anymore. Tinder probably left out they replaced it with this.

1
Pancake Mouse Avatar

15 Posts (+31), 492 Cmts (+149)

Interesting, I'll test this out next time I'm in an area with less profiles.

0
A

4 Posts (+2), 17 Cmts (+7)

This may also be why they recently started giving 1 boost on restored purchases.

It won’t be as effective and they know you’ll buy more trying to regain likes.

0
Playing With Fire Logo